IKS: Direction Towards Wisdom

Over the last few years, working closely with government systems, mentor teachers, psychologists, and classrooms across states, one insight has become very clear to me:

The problem in education is not effort. It is direction.

Teachers are trying. Systems are trying. But often, we are solving today’s challenges with fragmented approaches missing a deeper foundation that has always existed within our own context.

This is where I see the relevance of the Indian Knowledge System (IKS).

IKS is often misunderstood as “ancient knowledge” or something that belongs to the past. But in my experience on the ground, it is not about going backward. It is about reconnecting with ways of knowing that are deeply human, contextual, and experiential.

When I facilitate life skills sessions or train educators, I notice something interesting: The most powerful moments don’t come from content delivery. They come from reflection, dialogue, storytelling, and shared experience.

And that is exactly what IKS has always emphasized.
~Learning through lived experience, not just information
~Understanding self before understanding the world
~Building relationships, not just competencies
~Integrating knowledge across domains, not isolating subjects. 

In many ways, what we call Social Emotional Learning today has always existed in different forms within our own traditions.

However, the current education system still largely operates on:
A.Standardization over contextualization
B.Coverage over comprehension
C.Assessment over awareness

This creates a gap.
#A gap where teachers teach to the middle and lose the margins.
#A gap where students perform but do not always understand themselves.
#A gap where knowledge exists, but wisdom is missing.

NEP 2020 has opened a door by bringing IKS into the conversation. But inclusion in policy is only the first step. The real question is:

How do we translate this into classroom practice?

From my experience, a few shifts are essential:

1.From Content to Process:
Teachers need to be supported not just with what to teach, but how to facilitate spaces of thinking, sharing, and reflection.

2.From Training to Transformation:
Workshops cannot remain one-time events. Continuous engagement, mentoring, and safe spaces for educators are critical.

3.From Fragmented Subjects to Integrated Learning:
Life skills, stories, local knowledge, and academic concepts need to speak to each other.

4.From Fear to Safety:
No meaningful learning happens without psychological safety — for both students and teachers.

5.From External Metrics to Inner Awareness:
Assessment systems must evolve to value not just marks, but growth, self-awareness, and application.

For me, IKS is not a subject to be added. It is a lens to rethink education itself.

If we get this right, we are not just improving classrooms.

We are nurturing individuals who are aware, grounded, and capable of navigating complexity.
And perhaps that is what education was always meant to do.


#Education #IKS #NEP2020 #LifeSkills #SEL #TeacherDevelopment #PublicSystems #Learning

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Conversation and Safe Spaces: The Best Medium to Develop Understanding

Conversation and Safe Spaces: The Best Medium to Develop Understanding In teacher capacity-building workshops or trainings, if we truly want to empower teachers or bring about small shifts in them, we need to create more spaces for dialogues or conversation and a safe environment. When we are able to provide such an experience, only then will teachers see themselves as capable and effective in carrying this experience back to their classrooms. Most trainings are such that the PPT becomes the primary medium, limited only to sharing information. The trainer or stakeholder assumes that a training has been “done.” Through pre- and post-tests, it is also concluded that the training went well, because the questions are only based on the information provided. But in this, there is no real space where participants can share: 1. What did they feel? 2. What insights did they gain? 3. With what questions are they leaving this training? Now the question is: 1. Are we able to see or understand whet...
Read more

मैं हूँ...(I am From)

Image
मैं हूँ अधूरी बातों से जिन्हें सुने बिना, मुझे गुनाहगार बता दिया। मैं हूँ टूटे ख्वाबों से जिन्हें फिर भी मैं बुनता चला गया। मैं हूँ उलझे विचारों से जिन्होंने मुझे कविताओं में ढाल दिया। मैं हूँ मेरे अपनों से जिन्होंने दर्द में भी मुझे हँसना सिखा दिया। मैं हूँ अपने जिगरी यारों से जिन्होंने हारी हुई लड़ाई भरोसे से जीता दिया। मैं हूँ तेरी मोहब्बत से जिसने नफ़रत भुला दिया। मैं हूँ तेरी शख़्सियत से जिसने सिर उठाना सिखा दिया। मैं हूँ हक़ की लड़ाई से कुछ अनुभव से, कुछ पढ़ाई से, कमज़ोर रहे ना कोई, जिसने भलाई सिखा दिया। मैं हूँ लंबे इंतज़ार से जिसने धैर्य सिखा दिया। मैं हूँ ड्रीम अ ड्रीम से जिसने खुद को खुद से सुनना सिखा दिया, प्रोसेस को प्रोसेस करना और  ठहराव (pause) का महत्व अनुभव करा दिया, तुमको मुझको सुनना सिखा दिया। मैं हूँ अभी आभार से उनका  जिन्होंने जीवन समझा दिया! ~luvone CTS 2025
Read more

A Reflection from My Journey This Year

Throughout this year, one question kept showing up in almost every training and workshop—not as formal data, but as a lived context shared by teachers. Nearly every batch had teachers who carried this question with them. And honestly, I never felt it was wrong. It comes from their lived experience. They are the ones who stand in classrooms every day with children. We facilitate trainings and return, leaving behind a space—one where teachers slowly feel ready to go deeper into the question, sometimes in silence, sometimes with discomfort. The question usually sounds like this: “The government provides meals, uniforms, textbooks, and scholarships. Still, children don’t want to come to school. Why? ” As soon as this is said, many teachers nod in agreement. As the conversation moves ahead, some add: “Parents don’t value education.” “They don’t understand the purpose of schooling.” As a facilitator, I placed my own question in that space. I said: “I agree that these provisions exist. But if...
Read more